Reach.cat vs Vyro

Real CPM, fees and payout terms compared · Live data, refreshed hourly

Reach.cat averages $2.05 CPM (10% fee → $1.85 take-home) across 26 active campaigns. Vyro averages CPM (0% fee → take-home) across 0 campaigns. We don't run either platform — Clipping Atlas tracks all of them, so these numbers are neutral and live.

Reach.catVyro
Avg. CPM (advertised)live$2.05
Take-home CPM (after fee)live$1.85
Active campaignslive260
Platform fee10%0%
Payout speedNet-7Instant
Min. payout$5$15
Payout methodsUSDC, USDT, CryptoStripe, PayPal
OnboardingMedium · self-serveFast
LanguagesEN, FREN, PT
Trust score91/10086/100
Best forNo-KYC cryptoFast payouts

Key differences

  • Reach.cat advertises a higher average CPM ($2.05 vs —).
  • After fees, Reach.cat actually nets more per 1,000 views — about $1.85 take-home vs — (it takes a 10% cut vs 0%).
  • Vyro takes a smaller cut (0% vs 10%).
  • Vyro pays out faster (Instant).
  • Reach.cat has more active campaigns right now (26).

Reach.cat

Flat 10% commission with crypto (USDC/USDT) payouts and no KYC. Strong on EN podcasts and creator clips.

Vyro

Brands fund the campaigns, so clippers pay no platform fee. Fast Net-7 payouts and a growing gaming + creator catalog.

See live Reach.cat and Vyro campaigns side by side

Real CPMs, budgets and payout terms across 9 platforms.

Browse the catalog →

Frequently asked

Which pays more, Reach.cat or Vyro?
As of July 2026, across the live campaigns tracked by Clipping Atlas, Reach.cat shows the higher average CPM ($2.05 vs —), but rates vary by niche and change as campaigns rotate.
What's the difference in fees between Reach.cat and Vyro?
Reach.cat takes 10% and pays Net-7; Vyro takes 0% and pays Instant. Lower fees and faster payouts mean more of your CPM reaches you.
Can I clip on both Reach.cat and Vyro?
Yes. Most serious clippers run campaigns across several platforms at once. Clipping Atlas tracks both so you can compare live campaigns side by side.
How current is this comparison?
The CPM and active-campaign figures are pulled from live campaign data and refreshed automatically — unlike static reviews that go stale within weeks.

More comparisons